Driving or setup: separating causes

Why the order matters

A setup change and a driving change can cost the same lap time. Traces show both the inputs and the result, so read the inputs first. If they differ, the car was driven differently and the setup change is not yet isolated.

Signs in the traces

What each pattern suggests, and what would confirm it.
What you seePoints toConfirm with
Earlier lift or earlier braking in one runDrivingRepeat laps with a fixed braking reference.
Later or more gradual return to throttle on exitDriving, or traction limited by setupThrottle against steering: did the driver wait for the car?
Same inputs, lower minimum speedSetup or tyre stateHot pressures and tyre temperatures for both runs.
More steering for the same corner speedUndersteer from setup or tyresSteering angle and yaw rate, if logged.
Difference on only some lapsConsistency, traffic or track stateMore clean laps before any conclusion.

Read one corner window at a time

Pick the section where the time changed and read speed, throttle and brake through that window only. Compare where the lift starts, where the brake peaks, the minimum speed and where full throttle returns. A whole-lap overlay hides these details.

Put the missing context on the table

Traces rarely carry everything. Write down what changed and what was not measured: setup changes, fuel, tyre age, hot pressures, wind and the driver's own comment.

When it is both

A setup change often changes how the car is driven. More front roll stiffness can push the car on entry, and the driver may lift earlier to manage it. Treat that as a chain to test, not as proof of either cause: hold the setup, repeat a driving cue and see whether the gap closes.

Worked example from the synthetic session

In the synthetic Jerez session, run B lifts earlier and returns to throttle later through the corner window between 2100 and 2800 m. Run B also moved the front roll bar from 3 to 4, and hot tyre pressures were not measured in either run.

Both explanations fit. The driving explanation has direct evidence in the throttle trace. The setup explanation is plausible but unconfirmed, because the pressures that would support or rule it out are missing. The first test is to hold the setup and repeat the driving cue, as described in Designing one discriminating test.

Read both explanations on the synthetic session.

Request access to see the driving and setup hypotheses side by side, with their evidence.

Request access